Amvona

Watch Fr. Emmanuel on Russia's The Central TV Show Discussing US Economic Policy

In announcing tariffs against China, President Donald J. Trump is not launching a "trade war."

"It's not unreasonable for any leader of any country to seek equitable trade terms," Fr. Emmanuel told Russia's The Central TV Show March 7, 2018 from the construction site of St. Katherine Orthodox Chapel:

This segment on Russia's Central TV Show explores the possibility of a trade war between the US and China as well as the implications for investors and global economic policy.  Starting from the premise that US government actions are not driven by good business sense but by geopolitics and power; that there is a risk of starting a new global economic recession; that there could be opportunities for Russia.

Fr. Emmanuel's segment contrasts this position by defending the President's economic policies while pointing to a philosophy of investment based on creating wealth to do good vs. investment as speculation or taking actions in the global economy based on power politics.

Угроза или шанс: затронет ли Россию торговая война США и Китая

  • Read 6383 times
Read more...

Henrietta Eaton and the Boston Foreclosure Party

Image: Boston Real Estate Observer On June 22nd, 2012 the Massachusetts supreme court ruled on a very simple principle, that is to say a foreclosure by sale requires the foreclosing mortgagee, at the time of the sale, to hold both the mortgage and the underlying mortgage note.  the Case is Henrietta Eaton vs. Federal National Mortgage Association.

This may seem simple enough to the casual reader, except virtually no entities foreclosing on securitized mortgages in Massachusetts or elsewhere in the last five years (when the question has been especially relevant) possessed both of these items.

  • Read 15852 times
Read more...

Houston, we've got a problem - Bevilacqua

KranzConsole
 
On Oct. 18th, 2011 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court handed down their decision in the FRANCIS J. BEVILACQUA, THIRD vs. PABLO RODRIGUEZ – and in a moment, essentially made foreclosure sales in the commonwealth over the last five years wholly void. However, some of the more polite headlines, undoubtedly in the interest of not causing wide spread panic simply put it "SJC puts foreclosure sales in doubt" or "Buyer Can't Sue After Bad Foreclosure Sale"

In essence, the ruling upheld that those who had purchased foreclosure properties that had been illegally foreclosed upon (which is virtually all foreclosure sales in the last five years), did not in fact have title to those properties.

Given the fact that more than two-thirds of all real estate transactions in the last five years have also been foreclosed properties, this creates a small problem.

  • Read 75588 times
Read more...

Eaton – Dividing the Mortgage Loan and Affirming the Consequent

fallacey_image
Background: A post Ibanez world

In January the Massachusetts supreme judicial court held in US Bank National Association vs. Antonio Ibanez that a note holder may not foreclose on a property in order to redeem a debt, if they are not also the holder of a valid mortgage (that is to say also with a valid assignment). We outlined the details of this case and its implications in our article "Ibanez – Denying the Antecedent, Suppressing the Evidence and one big fat Red Herring" on January 11th, 2011.

  • Read 42820 times
Read more...

On the ethics of mortgage loan default

ethics_signIs it ethical for the American homeowner whose mortgage has been securitized to default, even If they are not financially distressed?  

First, consider it is unlikely that marketable, fee simple, insurable title can be obtained as a result of fulfilling the obligations of the related promissory note.  On the contrary the titles to some 60 million homes in America are badly clouded.  Secondly, encouraging investment in an asset class that has been artificially inflated, then deliberately destroying the price of the asset, as part of a separate profit making scheme is unethical, and any agreement based on this type of fraud is grounds to consider the original debt instrument used in the agreement null and void.  Fortunately these grounds are unnecessary, as increasingly US courts are ruling that these mortgages are already invalid for numerous other reasons.

  • Read 57169 times
Read more...

Ibanez – Denying the Antecedent, Suppressing the Evidence and one big fat Red Herring

red_herring_1The recent decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial court helped focus a few important questions on the foreclosure crisis in America, but it is also being used as a Red Herring, amongst other things, by the American Securitization Forum and their Bank owners.   The Massachusetts land court decision, which was affirmed by the Supreme Judicial Court were correct, but only addressed a narrow specter of the foreclosure crisis in our country and the underlying violations of long standing property law.   The case does point however to much more fundamental issues.  

  • Read 79953 times
Read more...

Tattoos, Pyramid Schemes and Social Justice

pyramid_scheme
 
We had planned to write a blog post on systemic fraud in the US financial infrastructure, particularly as it relates to the mortgage industry, mortgage origination and servicing fraud.  However, today a very good article was published by Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone which includes colorful first-hand accounts that vividly illustrates the problem on both a macro and micro scale. 
 
 
The plan was to outline these same points regarding the device of “securitization” of mortgage lending through derivatives that allow the formation of a traditional “pyramid” scheme, or what we prefer to call in the US a “Ponzi” scheme – perhaps, within a few years we may just opt to drop the name “Ponzi” altogether in favor of something like “business model for US banks in the early 21st century”.  However, rather than reproduce what Rolling Stone has already done, we thought it would be a better to simply promote the existing article, with a few additional and brief thoughts on what we feel is likely the only solution.
 
  • Read 25316 times
Read more...

Clean-Tech Economics: A Hypothesis Part 3

Current “Clean-Tech” enterprises present few “break-through” technologies. Rather there seems to be an improvement in overall efficiency of existing technologies, many of which (e.g. windmills, solar power) are quite old.

 

  • Read 16671 times
Read more...

Clean-Tech Economics: A Hypothesis Part 2

The internet may even pose a more precise analogy to “Clean-Tech” businesses than others insofar as the product is fundamentally important to us, and not merely a “want” which gives rise to consumption. In the case of the internet, the promise of the technology itself has more than been fulfilled, even if the promises of a great number of commercial concerns related to it have not. 

 

  • Read 7024 times
Read more...

Clean-Tech Economics: A Hypothesis

I venture to say that an economic movement which is based on our survival and well being as humans may be fundamentally too important to approach merely as a capitalist endeavor. Historically, novel technologies, even when related to existing demand, are difficult to efficiently monetize. Shifts in behavior however, (as they relate to those technologies) are a better bet.  How difficult will it be to create a substantial economic enterprise in an industry which is neither novel, nor benefited by consumption per sae?

 

  • Read 21877 times
Read more...

Don't
Hesitate To
Contact Us

 

145 Pine Haven Shores Road
Suite 2293
Shelburne, VT 05482

Feel free to email us. We would be happy to answer any questions you might have.


Copyright © 2021 Amvona